Zhonghai Tao; Jiechun Chen; Lijie Xiao; Chunfeng Liu
Volume 21, Issue 9 , 2019, Pages 1-8
Abstract
Background: Levodopa treatment is the gold standard in Parkinson’s disease but has the risk of dyskinesias. Selegiline delays the introduction of levodopa and pramipexole is used as a symptomatic treatment in Parkinson’s disease.Objectives: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of ...
Read More
Background: Levodopa treatment is the gold standard in Parkinson’s disease but has the risk of dyskinesias. Selegiline delays the introduction of levodopa and pramipexole is used as a symptomatic treatment in Parkinson’s disease.Objectives: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of pramipexole with selegiline in Parkinson’s disease patients.Methods: Data regarding motor and cognitive impairments and plasma phospholipids of 500 Chinese patients with confirmed Parkinson’s disease from medical records of 1 January 2015 to 1 June 2016 were retrospectively evaluated. Patients received either pramipexole (PP cohort, n = 250) or selegiline (SG cohort, n = 250). Also, data regarding hospitalization, adverse effects, and expen- diture were collected and analyzed from records of the follow-up period.Results: After 3-years of treatments, selegiline and pramipexole both improved motor and cognitive impairments and decreased plasma phospholipid levels (P < 0.05 for all). The intensity of improvement in motor and cognitive impairments and a decrease in the level of plasma phospholipids for pramipexole was higher than those of selegiline (P < 0.05 for all). Pramipexole caused muscle weakness (P = 0.015) and peripheral edema (P = 0.0004). While, selegiline caused cardiovascular disease (P = 0.008). Higher numbers of patients in the SG cohort were hospitalized during 3-years of treatment than those in PP cohort (11 vs. 1, P = 0.009). Selegiline treatment is more expensive than pramipexole (4,457 ± 345 ¥ vs. 3,649 ± 301 ¥/patient/year, P < 0.0001).Conclusions: Pramipexole treatment may have better improvement in motor and cognitive impairments than selegiline with neu- roprotective action and manageable side effects (Level of Evidence: III).
